The Petitioner also presented Surya Darma as a witness who was the Head of the PPS in Buket Pala Village, Ranto Peureulak District. Surya explained that there were no errors in each C-Result because if there were any errors or mistakes, they would be corrected directly according to the facts on the ground. However, the error occurred in the D-Result. According to Surya, in Ranto Peureulak District, based on the C-Result, Muhammad Daud obtained 901 votes, but when in the D-Result it changed to 963 votes. Meanwhile, Subki Tgk's votes. Jek did not change. “The error did not occur in the C-Result, because if there was an error in the C-Result, it would definitely be corrected immediately according to the facts on the ground. The error occurred in the D-Result. Muhammad Daud's votes in Ranto Peureulak District were 901 based on the C-Result. Meanwhile, based on the D-Result, there were 963 votes,” said Surya.

Finally, the Petitioner presented Taufik Hidayat as a witness who explained that the Petitioner's dispute with Muhammad Daud occurred because of an inflation of votes. The Petitioner had previously asked for it to be resolved in the Party Court, but Muhammad Daud did not attend two levels. In the end, the Petitioner asked the MPP for this dispute to be resolved in the Constitutional Court. “Subki Tgk. Jek initially asked for it to be resolved in the Party Court, but Muhammad Daud was absent twice, so Subki Tgk. Jek asked the MPP for it to be resolved in the Constitutional Court,” said Taufik.

Meanwhile, Marwan, a witness from the KPU, said that there were no objections at all to the election of DPRK candidates in East Aceh 2. “There are no objections,” said Marwan. The same thing was also conveyed by another KPU witness, Khairul Rizal.

According to the KPU through its witness, Said Ramadhan, explained that in Ranto Peureulak District, Subki Tgk. Jek, the petitioner, in the D-Result was recorded as obtaining 47 votes, while Muhammad Daud obtained 963 votes. “Subki Tgk. Jek 47 votes, Muhammad Daud 963 votes,” he said.

In Ranto Peureulak District, according to the C-Result, Subki Tgk. Jek obtained 51 votes, while Muhammad Daud obtained 901 votes. Meanwhile, in the D-Result, Subki Tgk. Jek became 47 votes, Muhammad Daud 963 votes. “Subki Tgk. Jek 51 votes, Muhammad Daud 901 votes. In the D-Result, Subki Tgk. Jek 47 votes, Muhammad 963 votes,” he said.

Previously, in the petition, the Petitioner argued that there was a difference in the vote acquisition which according to the Petitioner was correct with that stipulated by the Respondent (General Election Commission). Based on a comparison of Form Model C. Results - DPRK and Form Model D. Results of the DPRK District from two sub-districts in Dapil 2, namely East Peureulak and Ranto Peureulak, there was a difference in votes or an inflation of votes that benefited the Adil Sejahtera Party Legislative Candidate number 5 in the name of Muhammad Daud by 77 votes. This increase in votes caused Legislative Candidate number 1 (Petitioner) to lose a seat in the East Aceh DPRK.

Based on the arguments presented, the Petitioner asked the Constitutional Court to grant the Petitioner's entire petition, annul the General Election Commission's Decision number 360 of 2024, and order the General Election Commission to carry out a recount of ballot papers in East Peureulak District and Ranto Peureulak District in the East Aceh 2 Electoral District or determine the correct vote acquisition results according to the Petitioner for filling membership of the Aceh Timur Regency DPRK in the East Aceh 2 Electoral District.